[en_knapp]

(11-14-2014 10:59 PM)xavier.padulles Wrote:  Do you have the chronopic for encoder? It is a bit different. If you have it you could capture with your encoder and, after that, manualy edit the signal file to adapt the numbre of pulses.

I have the chronopic and it's working fine with both encoders, except the signal from the MuscleLab encoder. The reason for using the other encoder is mostly the better shape and not needing a magnetic surface. It also have less resistance and inertia.

I figured I could manually edit the signal but that takes away the advantage of the fine software chronojump is.is. I'll just have to hope that there will be a function for scaling the signal in the future.

Thanks

//Knappen