[snaper]

Xavi thank you for a constructive form. I am glad to know that I can help (although indirectly) to this community by uploading my results. I owe many, using Linux, applications and finally Chronojump itself.

I' ve been already discovering server results. Here I have to say that there were really unexpected values and midranges.
My colleague has over 1000 athletes measured and BEST results are around 60cm, this server declares that value as AVERAGE (talking about CMJ type).

Hence I'm little bit confused here because many of those athletes are on elite level (volleyball).

I have two explanations. One of them could be that pad gives bad results (but it is already one another using Bosco's system). And another, that there wasn't used required technique of jump (no hands). This is not a try to accusing someone, but find the crux of problem.

We are trying to make some deepest analysis through our measurements to define new dependencies in physiology and even methodology of results representation.
So worldwide accurate results should be a big help.
But momentarily isn't defined a group of "reliable" samples (evaluators respectively) wide enough.

Maybe a little bit out of topic, I' ve extended my reply by another aspects.

Pavel